Comments on: Leroy Jenkins T-shirt

By: GCline

GCline — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:56:04 +0000

Hey everyone! Thanks so much for the comments! We really appreciate it :)

By: Ryan

Ryan — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:37:45 +0000

I think I like #2…
I also suggest something for the back of the shirt…
“At least I have chicken”
It would add some curiosity for those who see the back of the shirt.

Keep up the good work.

By: Captain Avalanche

Captain Avalanche — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:42:34 +0000

I like the first design, but I think you drop one of the “R”s in “Leroy” and space out the “I”s and “!”s a bit in “Jenkins.” AND maybe reduce the “KKK” to just one K? Just sayin’.

By: Grace

Grace — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:54:28 +0000

I like version #2 better. I think it needs to be a little thicker and bolder. Just a little hard to see, but besides that Version 2 rocks. Slap it up there!

By: smithnwesson

smithnwesson — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:21:40 +0000

I think #2 works better.

By: Edward McIntyre

Edward McIntyre — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:50:31 +0000

Ok. I have a few thoughts.

Ascetically, I like the solid shirt better. Now that all depends on how it is printed. I bubble like that with standard screening would be large, be unconformable to were and crack easily. Where if it is discharge printed that would work out great.

That said, the font is where my issue lies. If the text was in a comicbook-ish font it would be bolder, look better on both designs, and fit well with the speech bubble motif.

I would also extend the lines of text to fill the shape of the bubble a little better. That way it flows with the bubble instead of fighting it’s shape.

Great Idea, keep up the good work!

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:41:03 +0000

wow this is hard. My first choice was one because it pops at you, but I would actually prefer to wear number 2.

By: melizzle

melizzle — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:40:28 +0000

Numero dos.

By: Dorren

Dorren — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:33:14 +0000

2, less obtrusive, easier on the eye, and uses less ink

By: abitnerdy

abitnerdy — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:30:46 +0000

#2 is more wearable, but #1 def. has more eye appeal :( im stuck